DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
TIR
Docket No: 7637-14/
431-09
20 March 2015
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
states Code, Section 1552 and request for a copy of the record of
trial and the names and votes of Board members who considered
your case.
Be advised that the Board is not the custodial authority for
trial records and as such cannot provide you with this
documentation. However, you may wish to contact, in writing, the
Assistant Judge Advocates General (AJAG), Military Law (Code 02),
1254 Charles Morris St., SE, Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC
20374-5047, to request a copy of your general court-martial trial
record.
Regarding the names and votes of Board members who considered
your case, be advised that on 4 November 2009, Mr. Boyd, Ms.
Ballinger, and Ms. Henkel considered your case, Docket No. 431-
09, and unanimously denied your request. On 2 December 2014, Ms.
Aldrich, Ms. McCain, and Mr. Spain considered your case, Docket
No. 7637-14 and also reconsidered your previous case, Docket No.
431-09, however, your request was again unanimously denied. In
this regard, in the absence of sufficient material evidence for
reconsideration, the decision of the Board is final, and your
only recourse would be to initiate action, at no cost to the
Board, to a court of appropriate jurisdiction.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00431-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 23 July 1984 after more than seven years of prior honorable service. ...
USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501392
The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. In a signed statement, the Applicant requested an administrative discharge under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of avoiding deportation and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00431 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 19 December 1995, you were discharged from active duty with a general characterization of service due to alcohol rehabilitation failure and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04078-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ° Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or © injustice. Although the discharge documentation is not in your record, it appears that you requested discharge for the good of the service to avoid trial by court-martial.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04219-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your request was approved by the discharge authority, and you received an undesirable discharge on 6 June 1975.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06303-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2009. Your request was approved by the discharge authority and you received a discharge under other than honorable conditions on 14 January 2000. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00870-01
870-01 24 January 2002 Dear Mr.- This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 16 January 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 3...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10471-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01414-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your _ application on 29 July 2009. Your request was approved and you received an undesirable discharge on 14 November 1974. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10839-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Your request for discharge was granted and on 10 April 1981, you received an other than honorable...